To: Campus Employees
From: Phillip Doolittle
Date: October 31, 2003
Subject: Assistance for Employees and Affiliate Employees Affected
by Local Fires
Caring for our community extends to helping our employees in times
of difficulty. To assist full-time employees affected by the local
fires, the following services will be provided to our benefits eligible,
full time employees.
- The
University will provide a lodging reimbursement up to $100.00
per day for as long as seven days for any employee who has been
evacuated from their home and has had to stay in a hotel/motel.
Receipts will be required for reimbursement.
-
The University will provide up to $35.00 per day for a food and
clothing stipend for as long as seven days to any employee who
has been evacuated, regardless of where the employee is temporarily
housed. Receipts required for reimbursement. Cash advances may
be available if needed.
- For
any employee who has lost their primary residence to fire, the
University will extend the above benefits for a total of 30 days.
- If
needed and requested, employees may also receive a $500.00 no
interest loan from the University. The loan funds will be paid
back after 90 days through payroll deduction. A five-month pay
back period will apply, unless employment is ended.
- Although
most employees who have been evacuated have been staying with
family or friends in the area, the University does have a few
apartments in the Central Avenue Apartment complex that are available
to provide temporary housing. To request temporary housing, an
employee should contact Human Resources or the Vice President
or Dean for their area. There will be no charge for this temporary
housing.
- The
University has an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) administered
by Managed Health Network available to assist any employees with
crisis, stress, legal or other needs. Please contact the EAP program
directly at 800-227-3310 or on the world wide web at www.MHN.com.
The
program outlined above will be administered through the Human Resources
Office. The number for Human Resources is Ext. 4040 or 909-335-4040.
This
program also applies to full-time employees of our affiliate organizations.
They are service providers with permanent operations on the Redlands
campus, including Barnes & Noble Bookstores, Bon Appetit Management
Company, ABM and Xerox.
If
you have any questions about this program to assist University employees
affected by the fires, please direct them to Human Resources.
To:
Campus Community
From: Char Burgess, Vice President and Dean of Student Life and
Phil Doolittle, Senior Vice President, Administration and Finance
Date: October 31, 2003
Subject: Fire Update Oct. 31, 2003, 4 p.m.
NEW
INFORMATION: The University of Redlands main campus remains in no
danger of fire damage as a result of the Southern California wildfires.
As
a residential campus, we, like other residential institutions in
Southern California, are remaining open and conducting classes,
including at our regional centers.
NEW
INFORMATION: As of 4 p.m., Oct. 31, the air quality in Redlands
is at a level permitting outdoor activity, according to the South
Coast Air Quality Management District. We plan to play our normal
athletic schedule on Saturday, Nov. 1. However, we will continue
to monitor the air quality, and any changes regarding outdoor activities,
including athletic events, will be communicated as needed.
The
Health Center is available to answer any questions or assist anyone
with special health needs.
Employees
should direct questions they have to Human Resources. Questions
from faculty should be referred to Academic Affairs.
Students
who have questions should contact Student Life. We do have students
and some employees who have been impacted by the wildfires, and
we are doing everything possible to respond to their needs.
NEW
INFORMATION: Employees will receive a separate e-mail from Senior
Vice President Phillip L. Doolittle detailing services the university
will provide to employees who have been evacuated or have lost their
homes. Questions about those services should be directed to Human
Resources.
Let
us reemphasize that the main campus is in no danger of fire damage.
However, we have received numerous phone calls regarding our emergency
response procedure. The university does have a structure in place
to manage emergency situations. Our emergency task force has been
activated and is monitoring the Southern California wildfires on
an ongoing basis. Also, our emergency operations center stands ready
to handle any situation.
NEW
INFORMATION: To view a map of the fire’s progression, please
go to http://www.esri.com/jicfire/fireinfo/oldfire.html.
The map shows the entire area that has been burned by the fire,
which is now heading north toward the High Desert.
TO:
Campus Community
FROM: EEO Office
DATE: October 2003
SUBJECT: Age and Misrepresentation
Age
discrimination is the fastest growing contributor to the reams of
unlawful discrimination cases in the courts and at the EEOC. Researchers
point to two reasons for these phenomena. First, the work force
is getting progressively older. Second, downsizing activities of
the 1990s and 2000s will involve the progressively older workforce
identified in the first reason. Seemingly innocent observations
often become the foe of the supervisor and the advocate of the plaintiff
in Age Discrimination cases.
In
Miller v. Eby Realty Group, Richard Miller, a 56-year-old employee,
was employed by Eby Realty Group as a General Manager of an assisted
living facility with an annual salary of $82,500.00 per year. The
company experienced financial troubles and it was forced to reduce
its workforce by 28 employees.
Just
prior to the reduction in force activities, the President of Eby
Realty Group approached Miller and said, “you don’t
need this aggravation anymore”, and “you are getting
older, do you really need all these employee and customer headaches
anymore?” The President told Miller, “You have contributed
nicely, maybe it is time to think about doing something else. We
have some really terrific kids that can come in and contribute.”
Shortly
after having these conversations, Miller was terminated because
of “economics and his job was being eliminated.” Just
one day after Miller was released, the company promoted a 32-year-old
employee to fill Miller’s former spot at a salary of $80,000.00
per year. Miller sued for wrongful termination based on violations
of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act which protects employees
that are 40 years of age and older from age based discrimination.
The
jury found for Miller and awarded him a substantial damage award,
including punitive damages against Eby Realty. Juries are always
fascinated to hear how a position filled by a satisfactory “older
worker” and slated for elimination is somehow preserved and
replaced with a younger employee, particularly when the time scheme
covers only a matter of days. In this case the court noted, “Such
inconsistencies are sufficient to cast doubt upon the firm’s
assertion that a reduction in force was the sole reason for a termination.
|